Though many of the first lady’s changes have been preserved, some changes have been made that will allow school food providers more options, which may also include providing tastier meals. Many view the legislation positively, and believe that it shows no matter what side of the political spectrum, we can all agree on the necessity of healthy and accessible food for children. Others feel it will benefit some major food companies in a way that is not good for children’s health.
The new legislation also includes a provision titled “Hunger Free Summer for Kids Act”, which is meant to ensure children still have access to lunches during the summer months when they are not in school. In many cases, the need to provide an additional meal to their children during the summer puts too much financial stress on families.
If passed by congress, the “Improving Child Nutrition Integrity and Access Act of 2016” will also reportedly increase the efficiency for various stakeholders regarding the school lunch programs and therefore the effectiveness of taxpayer resources, as well as increase the funding for the farm-to-school program—a big win for local food providers and advocates of local food.
What do you think about the school nutrition guidelines? Are they a step in the right direction, or should we be doing more to ensure children are eating healthy in schools?
